|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | = Core Rules =
| + | {{rumble round |
| − | | + | |player1=Barbaria|energy1=142|defence1=0 |
| − | == Ruleset and Gamestate == | + | |player2=The Greeks|energy2=133|defence2=10 |
| − | This is the '''Ruleset''' for BlogNomic; all CICs shall obey it. Section One consists of the “core rules” of BlogNomic, covering basic proposal mechanics; Section Two contains the rules of the current dynasty; and Section Three contains the appendix, which exists solely to clarify the remainder of the ruleset.
| + | |1vs2=142 |
| − | | + | |2vs1=123 |
| − | The Ruleset and Gamestate can only be altered in manners specified by the Ruleset.
| + | }} |
| − | | |
| − | CICs may correct obvious spelling and typographical mistakes in the Ruleset and their own Pending Proposals at any time, including replacing Spivak and gender-specific pronouns with the singular “they”.
| |
| − | | |
| − | If the Ruleset does not properly reflect all legal changes that have been made to it, any CIC may update it to do so.
| |
| − | | |
| − | == CICs ==
| |
| − | Any human may apply to join BlogNomic (if they are not already a CIC) by registering at http://blognomic.com via the Register link in the sidebar, and then making a post making clear their wish to be a '''CIC'''. An Admin shall add them to the roster in the sidebar and the GNDT, at which moment they become a CIC.
| |
| − | | |
| − | A CIC may cease to be a CIC at any time by posting an entry to the BlogNomic weblog requesting such an action. A human who has ceased to be a CIC in this way may not become a CIC again within the following two weeks. A CIC may only change their name as a result of a proposal approving the change.
| |
| − | | |
| − | Some CICs are '''Admins''', responsible for updating the site and the Ruleset, and are signified as such in the sidebar. CICs who wish to become Admins may sign up with a username for the Ruleset Wiki, and submit a Proposal to make themselves Admins. Existing Admins may be removed from their posts by Proposal, CfJ, or voluntary resignation. New admins shall be given the GNDT configuration password when they become admins.
| |
| − | | |
| − | ===Idle CICs===
| |
| − | | |
| − | Some CICs are '''Idle''', and shall be marked as such in the sidebar. For the purposes of all Gamestate and the Ruleset, excluding Rules “Ruleset and Gamestate”, “CICs”, “Dynasties”, “Fair Play” and any of those Rules’ subrules, Idle CICs are not counted as CICs.
| |
| − | | |
| − | If a Proposal contains a provision that targets a specifically named Idle CIC, then that Idle CIC is considered to be Unidle solely for the purposes of enacting that specific provision
| |
| − | | |
| − | When a CIC is unidled, if they went Idle in the same dynasty, their personal gamestate retains the last legally endowed values it had, if they are still valid. Otherwise (including if a value is invalid, does not exist, or the CIC Idled in a different dynasty), the CIC is given the default value for new CIC, if such a value exists.
| |
| − | | |
| − | An Admin may render a CIC Idle if that CIC has asked to become Idle in an entry or comment from the past four days, or if that CIC has not posted an entry or comment in the last seven days. In the latter case, the Admin must announce the idling in a blog post. Admins may render themselves Idle at any time, but should announce it in a post or comment when they do so. An Admin may Unidle a CIC if that CIC has asked to become Unidle in an entry or comment from the past four days, and Idle Admins may Unidle themselves at any time, unless the CIC who would be Unidled asked to become (or rendered themselves) Idle within the previous four days, and within the current dynasty.
| |
| − | | |
| − | Admins who are unidling themselves should, in their first vote following each unidling, highlight their changed idle status and any changes to quorum to have come about as a result of it.
| |
| − | | |
| − | == Dynasties ==
| |
| − | BlogNomic is divided into a number of '''Dynasties'''. Each Dynasty may be headed by a single CIC, known as the UNSG. If there is no UNSG, the Dynasty is a Metadynasty.
| |
| − | | |
| − | == Votable Matters ==
| |
| − | A '''Votable Matter''' is a post which CICs may cast Votes on, such as a Proposal, a Call for Judgement or a Declaration of Victory.
| |
| − | | |
| − | ===Votes===
| |
| − | Each CIC may cast one Vote on a Votable Matter by making a comment to the Official Post that comprises that Votable Matter using a voting icon of FOR, AGAINST, or DEFERENTIAL. Additional voting icons may be permitted in some cases by other rules. A valid Vote is, except when otherwise specified, a Vote of FOR or AGAINST. A CIC’s Vote on a Votable Matter is the last valid voting icon that they have used in any comment on that Votable Matter. Additionally, if the author of a Votable Matter has not used a valid voting icon in a comment to the post, then the author’s Vote is FOR. A non-CIC never has a Vote, even if they were a CIC previously and had cast a valid Vote.
| |
| − | | |
| − | If a CIC other than the UNSG casts a vote of DEFERENTIAL, then the Vote of DEFERENTIAL is an indication of confidence in the UNSG. When the UNSG has a valid Vote other than VETO on a Votable Matter, then all votes of DEFERENTIAL on that Votable Matter are instead considered to be valid and the same as the UNSG's Vote for the purposes of other rules unless otherwise specified.
| |
| − | | |
| − | A Votable Matter is '''Popular''' if any of the following are true:
| |
| − | * It has a number of FOR Votes that exceed or equal Quorum.
| |
| − | * It has been open for voting for at least 48 hours, it has more than 1 valid Vote cast on it, and more valid Votes cast on it are FOR than are AGAINST.
| |
| − | | |
| − | A Votable Matter is '''Unpopular''' if any of the following are true:
| |
| − | * The number of CICs who are not voting AGAINST it is less than Quorum.
| |
| − | * It has been open for voting for at least 48 hours is not Popular.
| |
| − | | |
| − | === Enacting and Failing ===
| |
| − | | |
| − | Votable Matters can either be Pending, Enacted, or Failed. When a Votable Matter is first put forward, it is considered Pending.
| |
| − | | |
| − | Whenever an Admin resolves a Votable Matter, they must also mark their name, and report the final tally of Votes (or the fact that it was self-killed or vetoed). Comments cannot be made on Enacted or Failed Votable Matters.
| |
| − | | |
| − | This rule cannot be overruled by Dynastic Rules in its application to Calls for Judgement or Declarations of Victory.
| |
| − | | |
| − | == Proposals ==
| |
| − | Any CIC may submit a '''Proposal''' to change the Ruleset or Gamestate, by posting an entry in the “Proposal” category that describes those changes (unless the CIC already has 2 Proposals pending, or has already made 3 Proposals that day).
| |
| − | | |
| − | === Special Proposal Voting ===
| |
| − | | |
| − | When a CIC casts a vote AGAINST their own Proposal (which is not in the form of a DEFERENTIAL vote), this renders the Proposal '''Self-Killed''', even if the author later changes their Vote. The UNSG may use VETO as a voting icon to cast a Vote on a proposal; when the UNSG casts a vote of VETO on a Proposal, this renders the Proposal Vetoed, even if the UNSG later changes their Vote.
| |
| − | | |
| − | === Resolution of Proposals ===
| |
| − | | |
| − | The oldest Pending [[#Proposals|Proposal]] may be '''Enacted''' by any Admin (by updating the Ruleset and/or Gamestate to include the specified effects of that Proposal, and then setting that Proposal's status to Enacted) if all of the following are true:
| |
| − | | |
| − | * It is Popular.
| |
| − | * It has been open for voting for at least 12 hours.
| |
| − | * It has not been Vetoed or Self-Killed.
| |
| − | | |
| − | The oldest Pending Proposal may be '''Failed''' by any Admin, if any of the following are true:
| |
| − | | |
| − | * It is Unpopular.
| |
| − | * It has been Vetoed or Self-Killed.
| |
| − | | |
| − | If a proposal somehow ends up being pending for more than 7 days, it is ignored for the purpose of calculating the oldest pending proposal, and can be failed by any Admin.
| |
| − | | |
| − | == Calls for Judgement ==
| |
| − | If two or more CICs actively disagree as to the interpretation of the Ruleset, or if a CIC feels that an aspect of the game needs urgent attention, then any CIC may raise a '''Call for Judgement''' (abbreviated CfJ) by posting an entry in the “Call for Judgement” category.
| |
| − | | |
| − | A Pending CfJ may be Enacted by any Admin if all of the following are ture:
| |
| − | | |
| − | * It is Popular.
| |
| − | | |
| − | A Pending CfJ may be Failed by any Admin if any of the following are true:
| |
| − | | |
| − | * It is Unpopular.
| |
| − | * It specifies neither changes to the Gamestate or Ruleset nor corrections to any gamestate tracking entities.
| |
| − | | |
| − | When a CfJ is Enacted, the Admin Enacting it shall update the Gamestate and Ruleset, and correct the GNDT and other gamestate tracking entities, as specified in the CFJ.
| |
| − | | |
| − | This Rule may not be overruled by Dynastic Rules.
| |
| − | | |
| − | == Victory and Ascension ==
| |
| − | If a CIC (other than the UNSG) believes that they have achieved victory in the current Dynasty, they may make a post to the Blognomic weblog in the '''Declaration of Victory''' category, detailing this.
| |
| − | | |
| − | Upon doing so, the game immediately goes into '''Hiatus''', if it hasn’t already. During this time, the only game actions that may be taken are those covered by Rules “CICs”, “Votable Matters”, “Calls for Judgement”, “Gamestate Tracking” and “Victory and Ascension”.
| |
| − | | |
| − | Every CIC may cast Votes on that DoV to indicate agreement or disagreement with the proposition that the poster has achieved victory in the current Dynasty.
| |
| − | | |
| − | A Pending DoV may be Enacted by any Admin if any of the following is true:
| |
| − | | |
| − | * It is Popular, it has been open for at least 12 hours, and either the UNSG has Voted FOR it or it has no AGAINST Votes.
| |
| − | * It is Popular, and it has been open for at least 24 hours.
| |
| − | | |
| − | A Pending DoV may be Failed by any Admin if any of the following are true:
| |
| − | | |
| − | * It is Unpopular, and it has been open for at least 12 hours.
| |
| − | | |
| − | When a DoV fails and there are no pending DoVs, Hiatus ends.
| |
| − | | |
| − | When a DoV is enacted, all other active DoVs are failed, and a new Dynasty begins with the CIC who made the DoV as its UNSG. That CIC may pass this role to another CIC at this point by making a post to that effect, if they wish. The Hiatus continues until the new UNSG makes an '''Ascension Address''' by posting an entry in the “Ascension Address” category - this should specify the UNSG's chosen theme for the new Dynasty, and may optionally specify that the terms CIC and UNSG will be replaced with theme-specific terms throughout the entire ruleset, and/or a number of dynastic rules to keep. Upon posting such an Ascension Address, the Ruleset is updated to reflect any changed terms, and any dynastic rules which were not listed to be kept are repealed.
| |
| − | | |
| − | A DoV may not be started in the period between an enacted DoV and that DoV’s Ascension Address. When a DoV is failed, if it had at least one AGAINST vote, the CIC who posted it cannot make another DoV until after 120 hours (5 days) have passed since the time their DoV was failed.
| |
| − | | |
| − | This rule cannot be overruled by Dynastic Rules as it relates to Declarations of Victory, but can be overruled in other matters.
| |
| − | | |
| − | == Fair Play ==
| |
| − | The following are BlogNomic’s rules of '''fair play'''. If any of these rules are found to have been broken, or if a CIC's behaviour or actions are otherwise deemed unacceptable (socially or otherwise), a proposal or CfJ may be made to reprimand or punish the perpetrator or, in cases of extreme or repeated violations, remove them from the game and bar them from rejoining.
| |
| − | | |
| − | * A single person should not control more than one non-Idle CIC within BlogNomic, and should announce publicly if they control both a non-Idle CIC and any Idle CICs.
| |
| − | * A CIC should not “spam” the BlogNomic blog. What counts as spamming is subjective, but would typically include posting more than ten blog entries in a day, more than ten blog comments in a row, or posting a blog entry of more than 1000 words.
| |
| − | * A CIC should not deliberately exploit bugs or unexpected behaviours in the software running the game (ExpressionEngine, MediaWiki or the GNDT).
| |
| − | * A CIC should not edit their own blog comments once posted, nor those of any other CIC.
| |
| − | * A CIC should not edit the "Entry Date" field of a blog post.
| |
| − | * A CIC should not make a DoV primarily to delay the game by putting it into Hiatus.
| |
| − | * A CIC should not do any action meant to make the game unplayable (for example, changing multiple keywords to the same word in an ascension address).
| |
| − | * A CIC should not roll dice in the GNDT that are clearly associated with a particular action in the Ruleset, but with the intention to not use these rolled values to the best of their ability to resolve that action.
| |
| − | | |
| − | ==Seasonal Downtime==
| |
| − | Blognomic goes into hiatus every year on December 24th, and remains in hiatus until December 27th. During this time no game actions may be taken except those described in the rules entitled “Votable Matters,” “Gamestate Tracking” and “Call for Judgement”.
| |
| − | | |
| − | ==Atomic Actions==
| |
| − | | |
| − | When a CIC performs an Atomic Action, they must complete all its steps; they must complete them in order; and they may not take any other action defined in the Ruleset until all such steps are complete. In addition, the CIC performing an Atomic Action performs its steps as quickly as they are able.
| |
| − | | |
| − | If one or more steps of an Atomic Action were done incorrectly, the CIC must redo the Atomic Action. In redoing an Atomic Action, the CIC uses any legal steps that were already completed in the illegal Atomic Action and only redoes the illegal ones.
| |
| − | | |
| − | For instance if an Atomic Action consists of rolling a die in the GNDT and then doing steps based upon it’s result the CIC would have to reroll the die if they rolled the wrong one if the first place and any steps that depended upon the result of that die; however if all they did was take an illegal action later on, the die is still used in the redone action.
| |
| − | | |
| − | If the Atomic Action was illegal due to a die that was wrong in the GNDT (for example, rolling a 1 on a DICE6 gives that CIC a point and the rest do nothing and the CIC rolls a DICE5 in the first one) and in redoing the Atomic Action they get the same effect as before (i.e. rolling an incorrect die and getting result X but then rolling the correct die and still getting result X) then the steps that depended upon that result are valid and don’t need to be redone. Steps that depend upon multiple dice which were done incorrectly must have each incorrect die have the same effect to be considered valid.
| |
| − | | |
| − | For the purposes of determining the ordering or legality of game actions the time of an Atomic Action shall be the time that it is completed. For Atomic Actions that are redone, the time of completion is the last redone step.
| |
