Difference between revisions of "Talk:2020 Data Analysis"
(Created page with "==Proposals made vs dynasties headed== thumb|Graph where X=proposals made and Y=dynasties headed File:Proposals made vs dynasti...") |
(→Coregency and Metadynasty: new section) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
[[File:Proposals made vs dynasties held v2.jpg|thumb|Same graph with Kevan removed]] | [[File:Proposals made vs dynasties held v2.jpg|thumb|Same graph with Kevan removed]] | ||
I haven't got the spreadsheet skills to superimpose these, but this stood out as an interesting correlation, when playing around with the data: the number of proposals someone has submitted matches up with how many dynasties they've headed, to the point where including myself as a massive outlier doesn't put me that far from the average line. (Two different average lines are shown here, but they're not far off of each other; 1/75 versus 1/78.) Unclear how much of this is "being Emperor means you make more proposals during those dynasties" and how much is "making proposals helps you win", of course, but "proposals made" seems a good yardstick for how much someone is playing the whole game. --[[User:Kevan|Kevan]] ([[User talk:Kevan|talk]]) 14:36, 23 September 2020 (UTC) | I haven't got the spreadsheet skills to superimpose these, but this stood out as an interesting correlation, when playing around with the data: the number of proposals someone has submitted matches up with how many dynasties they've headed, to the point where including myself as a massive outlier doesn't put me that far from the average line. (Two different average lines are shown here, but they're not far off of each other; 1/75 versus 1/78.) Unclear how much of this is "being Emperor means you make more proposals during those dynasties" and how much is "making proposals helps you win", of course, but "proposals made" seems a good yardstick for how much someone is playing the whole game. --[[User:Kevan|Kevan]] ([[User talk:Kevan|talk]]) 14:36, 23 September 2020 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Coregency and Metadynasty == | ||
| + | |||
| + | i was one of the emperors of the only Coregency, not sure if others agree whether that counts or not towards mantels under my belt. Also i feel like my involvement with the Eight Metadynasty (defining the player term, proposing the Metadynasty in the first place after the Katamari dynasty dwindled) was very close to that of an Emperor but i do understand how it doesn't really count statistically. | ||
Revision as of 01:28, 25 September 2020
Proposals made vs dynasties headed
I haven't got the spreadsheet skills to superimpose these, but this stood out as an interesting correlation, when playing around with the data: the number of proposals someone has submitted matches up with how many dynasties they've headed, to the point where including myself as a massive outlier doesn't put me that far from the average line. (Two different average lines are shown here, but they're not far off of each other; 1/75 versus 1/78.) Unclear how much of this is "being Emperor means you make more proposals during those dynasties" and how much is "making proposals helps you win", of course, but "proposals made" seems a good yardstick for how much someone is playing the whole game. --Kevan (talk) 14:36, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Coregency and Metadynasty
i was one of the emperors of the only Coregency, not sure if others agree whether that counts or not towards mantels under my belt. Also i feel like my involvement with the Eight Metadynasty (defining the player term, proposing the Metadynasty in the first place after the Katamari dynasty dwindled) was very close to that of an Emperor but i do understand how it doesn't really count statistically.
