Difference between revisions of "The First Coregency of Diabecko and card"
Cuddlebeam (talk | contribs) (herpa derpa I put my commentary in the wrong place, fixing.) |
|||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
==Posts of Interest== | ==Posts of Interest== | ||
| − | + | {{to be completed}} | |
*[https://blognomic.com/archive/the_glass The Glass]: Set up the rules for the Coregency - card and Diabecko would '''share''' the Dynasty. A first in Blognomic! | *[https://blognomic.com/archive/the_glass The Glass]: Set up the rules for the Coregency - card and Diabecko would '''share''' the Dynasty. A first in Blognomic! | ||
Revision as of 17:05, 3 March 2020
March 8 — May 6, 2018
Ascension Address
Alice rubbed her eyes.
‘Oh dear’ she muttered. ‘It happened again.’
Change Resident to Pawn and Government to King. Repeal all dynastic rules except for “Swifter Than The Admins”
https://blognomic.com/archive/waking_up
Players
The following players were active at the start of the Dynasty: Axemabaro, card*, Cuddlebeam, Diabecko, ElMarko, Kevan*, nqeron, pokes*, Thunder
The following players were active at the end of the Dynasty: TBA
Final Ruleset
Posts of Interest
- (This list of significant dynastic events is currently incomplete.)
- The Glass: Set up the rules for the Coregency - card and Diabecko would share the Dynasty. A first in Blognomic!
Ascension
After several weeks with very few proposals and the failure of a deliberately badly-worded "treasure hunt" scam, Pokes proposed to elect a winner from any players who wished to stand. Kevan won the vote with 5 votes to Cuddlebeam's 4, and other players receiving 1 or 2.
Commentary
D U A L. E M P E R O R. D Y N A S T Y. It's happening. --Cuddlebeam (talk) 18:52, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
Dragged on too long with uninteresting to play, even if they were innovative, starting mechanics. There wasn't an initial direction given for players to expand upon in the theme or gameplay so the uninteresting play was never completely corrected. Card (talk) 05:44, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
Did seem like the dual emperorship might have been the problem here. If there are two people in charge, there's less pressure on either one of them to sort out any issues with gameplay. --Kevan (talk) 10:27, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
My first dynasty where I participated! I didn’t really do much though...Anyways, the DoV was delayed because Kevan forgot to sign his name when adminning the post. Just thought I’d bring that up. Jumble! (talk) 12:30, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
I believe two-Emperor dynasties can work very well, just not like this. Having to Emperors with parallel powers doesn't add much to the dynasty - it would've been better if they weren't so similar to each other, so that they were comparable to just a one usual Emperor but that occupies two player slots in the game. Still, I'm very glad they had the goddamn balls to even pull this off in the first place, because if they didn't, then we wouldn't know how to do better dual-Emperors dynasties in the future. I appreciate it a lot. Also, Jumble, other Admins have done that mistake too. --Cuddlebeam (talk) 14:17, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
