Difference between revisions of "Talk:The First Dynasty of pokes"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Cuddlebeam (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
::Yes, it was that. Sorry for the misunderstanding but the "full commentary" was referring to covering the lack of commentary on gameplay, not further expansion on dynastic quotas. I don't much else to say about it, I just really liked it in comparison to daily actions. At the time, Kevan XX and Viv I were the only dynasties I had played, and they had a lot of daily actions, and this was a smack in the face of a mechanic that solved what I disliked about that kind of tempo. It made it feel more strategic and fair and less "oh I happen to be online to slot in my daily pay, if I do this enough as the rest of players are too bored to do this menial task, I win" and more "we all start with the same cash - it's up to your smarts to make the best use of it" 21:28, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[[User:Cuddlebeam|Cuddlebeam]] ([[User talk:Cuddlebeam|talk]]) | ::Yes, it was that. Sorry for the misunderstanding but the "full commentary" was referring to covering the lack of commentary on gameplay, not further expansion on dynastic quotas. I don't much else to say about it, I just really liked it in comparison to daily actions. At the time, Kevan XX and Viv I were the only dynasties I had played, and they had a lot of daily actions, and this was a smack in the face of a mechanic that solved what I disliked about that kind of tempo. It made it feel more strategic and fair and less "oh I happen to be online to slot in my daily pay, if I do this enough as the rest of players are too bored to do this menial task, I win" and more "we all start with the same cash - it's up to your smarts to make the best use of it" 21:28, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[[User:Cuddlebeam|Cuddlebeam]] ([[User talk:Cuddlebeam|talk]]) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :::Ah, got it. We should definitely try to do more of that. --[[User:Kevan|Kevan]] ([[User talk:Kevan|talk]]) 09:19, 10 August 2020 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 09:19, 10 August 2020
Dynastic Quota?
Paging User:Cuddlebeam to provide that promised full commentary about Dynastic Quotas, at some point. This sounds like something worth knowing about, but I can't see any obvious signs of a quota of anything, from a skim of the final ruleset. --Kevan (talk) 15:08, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
- I'm assuming he means the finite amount of cash proposed at the very beginning. For some of the dynasty it could only be decreased, eventually limiting actions. I'm also interested in the full commentary on it. Pokes (talk) 19:38, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, it was that. Sorry for the misunderstanding but the "full commentary" was referring to covering the lack of commentary on gameplay, not further expansion on dynastic quotas. I don't much else to say about it, I just really liked it in comparison to daily actions. At the time, Kevan XX and Viv I were the only dynasties I had played, and they had a lot of daily actions, and this was a smack in the face of a mechanic that solved what I disliked about that kind of tempo. It made it feel more strategic and fair and less "oh I happen to be online to slot in my daily pay, if I do this enough as the rest of players are too bored to do this menial task, I win" and more "we all start with the same cash - it's up to your smarts to make the best use of it" 21:28, 9 August 2020 (UTC)Cuddlebeam (talk)
