Difference between revisions of "The Coregency of Diabecko and card"
(Commented.) |
|||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
Did seem like the dual emperorship might have been the problem here. If there are two people in charge, there's less pressure on either one of them to sort out any issues with gameplay. --[[User:Kevan|Kevan]] ([[User talk:Kevan|talk]]) 10:27, 6 May 2018 (UTC) | Did seem like the dual emperorship might have been the problem here. If there are two people in charge, there's less pressure on either one of them to sort out any issues with gameplay. --[[User:Kevan|Kevan]] ([[User talk:Kevan|talk]]) 10:27, 6 May 2018 (UTC) | ||
| + | My first dynasty where I participated! I didn’t really do much though...Anyways, the DoV was delayed because Kevan forgot to sign his name when adminning the post. Just thought I’d bring that up. [[User:Jumble!|Jumble!]] ([[User talk:Jumble!|talk]]) 12:30, 6 May 2018 (UTC) | ||
{{Dynastic Histories}} | {{Dynastic Histories}} | ||
Revision as of 12:30, 6 May 2018
March 8 — May 6, 2018
Ascension Address
Alice rubbed her eyes.
‘Oh dear’ she muttered. ‘It happened again.’
Change Resident to Pawn and Government to King. Repeal all dynastic rules except for “Swifter Than The Admins”
https://blognomic.com/archive/waking_up
Players
The following players were active at the start of the Dynasty: Axemabaro, card*, Cuddlebeam, Diabecko, ElMarko, Kevan*, nqeron, pokes*, Thunder
The following players were active at the end of the Dynasty: TBA
Final Ruleset
Posts of Interest
- The Glass: Set up the rules for the Coregency - card and Diabecko would share the Dynasty. A first in Blognomic!
Ascension
After several weeks with very few proposals and the failure of a deliberately badly-worded "treasure hunt" scam, Pokes proposed to elect a winner from any players who wished to stand. Kevan won the vote with 5 votes to Cuddlebeam's 4, and other players receiving 1 or 2.
Commentary
D U A L. E M P E R O R. D Y N A S T Y. It's happening. --Cuddlebeam (talk) 18:52, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
Dragged on too long with uninteresting to play, even if they were innovative, starting mechanics. There wasn't an initial direction given for players to expand upon in the theme or gameplay so the uninteresting play was never completely corrected. Card (talk) 05:44, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
Did seem like the dual emperorship might have been the problem here. If there are two people in charge, there's less pressure on either one of them to sort out any issues with gameplay. --Kevan (talk) 10:27, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
My first dynasty where I participated! I didn’t really do much though...Anyways, the DoV was delayed because Kevan forgot to sign his name when adminning the post. Just thought I’d bring that up. Jumble! (talk) 12:30, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
